1. Real Estate Transfer Statement

•     
• Here was a situation where Ms. Humphrey filed false statements on her Affidavit claiming half ownership in Smith's property per her deceased husband's will. This was the fraudulent document filed by John C. Chatelain to begin this case as Douglas County, Nebraska District Court Case No. CI 18-9530. Folk’s, this WILL never existed. So once again and as found under Nebraska Revised Statute 27-503(4)(a) (4) There is privilege under this rule: (a) If the services of the lawyer are sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew or reasonably should have known to be a crime or fraud. Barbara Humphrey's testimonials under oath during her May 29, 2020 Deposition offers evidence of Ms. Humphrey's having known that her deceased husband Donald W. Humphrey had forgiven Edward Smith of the loan before Donald died and therefore should not have sought out John Chatelain to file the lawsuit because she’d held no interest in the property.
• The following is testimony from Ms. Humphrey's deposition which she did not disclose under No. 25 of her interrogatories but her own testimonials prove that this meeting had taken place and not disclosed before filing her fraudulent lawsuit..
• Excerpts from Barbara’sMay 29, 2020 Deposition
• 46:16-18 Smith: I'm getting to a point here okay? When I explained that to him, the first thing he said was that we can afford to go up to ten; am I correct?
• 46:19 Barbara: Yes.
• 46:20 Smith: And it angered you?
• 46:21 Barbara: Yes.
• 4622-24 Smith: The first words out of your mouth was, oh, so he's got the house and he's getting a new truck. And with that, you jumped up and you ran out the front door; am I correct?
• 46:25; 47:1 Matthew Saathoff: Listen to his question, and answer his question.
• 47:2-3 Barbara: I was upset with that statement, yes. I went to the front door.
• Under Cross-Examination Barbara testified as follows:
• 80:15-16 Mr. Saathoff: Did you ever make the statement "So now he has a house and a car?" Yes or no?
• 80:17 Barbara: A house and a truck.
• 80:18 Mr. Saathoff: A house and a truck.
• 80:19 Barbara: Yes.
• 80:20 Mr. Saathoff: Okay. And what did you mean by that?
• 80:21-22 Barbara: Well, Don had wanted to give him the house, the 25,000 that he put up front for the house.
• With this testimony being in the records, this shows evidence of a meeting having taken place before Don died whereas Don had forgiven Smith for the remainder of the loan. 
• So here had been a situation where Barbara had known the loan had been forgiven before she'd sought for John Chatelain to file this fraudulent Affidavit.

•   
• Under 640 the high court writes that when a partition action involves a dispute over ownership or title as well as a dispute over the method of partition, the parties have a right to have title determined first.
• On appeal, this court recognized that the "sole matter contested was the construction and effect of the WILL" 
• Under 641 the high court writes: because the order construing the WILL determined the whole controversy.
• Also under 641 the high court rights, in making this determination, we recognized that the real controversy in this action was the issue of title and that the partition prayed for was only incidental, because if the Plaintiffs did not succeed in establishing their title, they would have no right to partition.
• Under 642 the high court recognized Barbara by name when writing; the real controversy in this case is the issue of title, and the partition is incidental to the issue of title. If Barbara does not succeed in establishing her title, she has no right to partition. 

• In another documented case finding Barbara preparing and presenting false statements to the Court. Under lines 31, 33 and 34 from her Complaint for Partition find Barbara falsely claiming that Smith owed her back rent on Smith's own real estate property. False statements that were later retracted.

1. Over the objections of his wife Barbara Humphrey, his daughter Elizabeth Humphrey and son in law Joe Hendrick's. Donald W. Humphrey "now deceased," made a loan to Ed in the amount shown as $25,219.92. Below shows a copy of the Cashier's Check which was used for purposes of helping Ed to purchase the subject Real Estate property at issue in the Douglas County, Nebraska District Court Case No. CI 18 9530 Lawsuit against Ed and Dora. Evidence from Barbara's own trial testimonials offer proof that Don acted as the mortgage holder (only), when making this loan to Ed. Don's name was placed on the property's title (only), until Ed  repaid the loan in full. At which time Donald Humphrey's name would be remove from the title and Ed would become sole owner of the property. However, before Don's death on August 24, 2018, Don, Ed, Dora and Barbara were gathered in a meeting at the Humphrey's residence. During this meeting Barbara had been seated to the right side of Don within 3 feet . While sitting in the presence of his wife Barbara, Don forgave the remainder of the loan at issue in this case. On May 27, 2022 the opinion's of The Nebraska Supreme Court acknowledged that if Don did indeed forgive the  loan, that this forgiveness had acted as a relinquishment of any ownership interest Don may have held in the subject property and that his relinquishment had left Ed as sole owner of the Real Estate property. Evidence from Barbara Humphrey's May 29, 2020 Deposition discloses facts of this meeting having taken place as well as Don's forgiveness of the loan which at the time had angered Barbara and caused her to jump up from her seated position and run out of her front door. Further, evidence from Barbara's May 23, 2023 trial testimonials had once again acknowledged this meeting had taken place and her reactions to Don's forgiveness of the loan relinquished his interest as the property's mortgage holder. 

• After Donald Humphrey forgave Ed for the remainder of the outstanding loan, Don then instructed his wife Barbara Humphrey to write Ed a check in the amount of $10,000. This money was meant to replace an older pickup truck that he'd gifted Ed and that his wife Barbara, daughter Elizabeth Humphrey and Joe Hendrick's had towed away from Ed's property and sold. Barbara wrote this $10,000 check on August 8, 2018. Since Elizabeth, Joe and Barb conspired to take back the gifted Chevy Silverado this $10,000 was gifted to Ed for purposes of buy another truck which can be viewed as #6 2007 Ford F150 SuperCab XLT.

Rest in Peace!